Legal Opinion
Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 2015No. 12-0657PublishedCited by 295 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson
Justice Green, Justice Willett, Justice Lehrmann, and Justice Devine joined.
In this declaratory judgment action several individuals practicing commercial eyebrow threading and the salon owners employing them assert that, as applied to them, Texas’s licensing statutes and regulations violate the Texas Constitution’s due course of law provision. They claim that most of the 750 hours of training Texas requires for a license to practice commercial eyebrow threading are not related to health and safety or what threaders actually do. The State concedes that over 40% of the required hours are…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by295 opinions
- Wallace L. Hall, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Regent for the University of Texas System v. William H. McRaven, in His Official Capacity as Chancellor for the University of Texas SystemTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Honors Acad., Inc. v. Tex. Educ. AgencyTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Altagracia Sanchez v. Office of the State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- City of Austin v. Utility Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Craig v. Tejas Promotions, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.