Legal Opinion
Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 8, 1934No. 370PublishedCited by 1,597 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
Appellant contests the validity of Chapter’339 of the Laws of Minnesota of 1933, p. 514, approved April 18, .1933, called the Minnesota Mortgage Moratorium Law, *416as being repugnant to the contract clause (Art. I, § 10) and the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, of the Federal Constitution. The statute was sustained by the Supreme Court of Minnesota, 189 Minn. 422, 448-249 N.W. 334, 893, and the case comes here on appeal.
The Act provides that, during the emergency declared to exist, relief may be had. through authorized judicial proceedings with respect to…
2Cases cited127 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,597 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
1,592 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.