Legal Opinion
Kuehl v. Chrysler Pension Plan
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 18, 1995No. 93-C-444PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On May 3, 1993, Ronald Kuehl brought this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin against Chrysler Pension Plan (hereinafter “Chrysler Plan”) and Chrysler Corporation (hereinafter “Chrysler”), alleging that he has been denied pension benefits due him under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. and under a theory of promissory estoppel. This case was randomly assigned to this court. The parties have consented to the full jurisdiction of this court pursuant to 28…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fitch v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Easa v. Florists' Transworld Delivery Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
- Gramm v. Bell Atlantic Mgt.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Adams v. Brink's CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2005
- Christensen v. Qwest Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2005