Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Qwest Pension Plan
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided July 14, 2005No. 8:04CV633PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
This is an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”), in which plaintiff Duane Christensen claims the Employee Benefits Committee of the Qwest Pension Plan (“Plan”) violated its fiduciary duty and its duty under 29 U.S.C. §§ 1025 and 1132 to provide accurate benefit statements to Christensen.
Christensen alleges that he contacted the Plan five times requesting retirement benefit calculations that assumed different retirement dates. Based on the information he received, Christensen says he…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gregory v. City of RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Michael R. DANCY, Appellant, v. HYSTER COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duane L. Christensen, Plaintiffappellant v. The Qwest Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Duane L. Christensen v. Qwest Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006