Legal Opinion
Easa v. Florists' Transworld Delivery Ass'n
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 24, 1998No. 2:97-cv-73006PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DUGGAN, District Judge.
Opinion
This matter is currently before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has filed a response in opposition to the defendant’s motion. On April 9, 1998, the Court held a hearing on defendant’s motion. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Background
Plaintiff commenced employment with defendant on February 21, 1966. As an employee, plaintiff eventually became eligible for retirement benefits pursuant to defendant’s pension plan.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Nachwalter v. ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Virginia Armistead, Cross-Appellants v. Vernitron Corporation Aie--Division of Vernitron Group Insurance Plan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Duane L. Christensen, Plaintiffappellant v. The Qwest Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Fitch v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Adams v. Brink's CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2005
- Christensen v. Qwest Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2005
- Bowles v. Estes Express Lines CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.