Legal Opinion
Fitch v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 16, 1999No. 6:95-cv-06212PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
This is an action in which former employees of the defendant Chase Manhattan Bank seek additional retirement benefits pursuant to ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. Now before the Court are the par ties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [# 33][# 42], For the reasons that follow, the plaintiffs’ motion is denied, and the defendants’ motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The relevant facts are not disputed. Until July of 1984, all plaintiffs were employed by Lincoln First Bank (“Lincoln”) and were participants in Lincoln’s retirement plan (the “Lincoln Plan”).…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bouboulis v. Transport Workers Union Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- De Pace v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Amanda Crosby, Administratrix for the Estate of Billy K. Allred v. Rohm & Haas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Duane L. Christensen, Plaintiffappellant v. The Qwest Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Del Greco v. CVS Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.