Legal Opinion
Adams v. Brink's Company
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided June 3, 2005No. 2:02CV00044PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SARGENT, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case involves the claims of 123 plaintiffs against their current or former employer, Paramont Coal Corporation, (“Paramont”), its current parent company, the Brink’s Company, (“Brink’s”),- the Brink’s Company Pension-Retirement Plan, (“the Brink’s Plan”), and the- Administrative Committee for Brink’s Company Pension-Retirement Plan, (“the Administrative Committee”). The plaintiffs seek declaratory and equitable relief as well as damages under various claims related to the administration , of the Brink’s Plan.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams v. The Brink's CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Moore v. Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022