Legal Opinion
Skarsten v. Dairyland Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 4, 1986No. C1-85-1533PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
In this declaratory judgment action the trial court found that appellant Milton Skarsten and the named insured, his daughter Cheryl Skarsten, did not reside in the same household; the court consequently concluded appellant was not an insured person under the terms of two policies issued by respondent Dairyland Insurance Co. Appellant’s motion for amended findings or for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence was subsequently denied. We reverse.
FACTS
On December 25, 1982, appellant Milton Skarsten was injured in an automobile accident while riding as a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. ViktoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. MacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Van Overbeke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wood v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Frey v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Morgan v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Johnson v. American Economy Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile v. Phillip J. MerrillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.