Legal Opinion
Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. Viktora
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 30, 1982No. 81-467PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
Firemen’s Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey (Firemen’s) sought a judicial determination pursuant to Minn.Stat. c. 555 (1980) that defendant David Viktora was not an insured under his parents’ homeowner’s liability insurance policy and that, therefore, Firemen’s had no duty to defend or indemnify Viktora in the action commenced against him by defendant Sandra Olson. The question before the district court, and before us, is whether, at the time of the accident on October 7, 1977, David Viktora was a resident of the household of the named insured, his parents, Jerry and Mary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. MacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Fruchtman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Richard Blanchard v. Peerless Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Leonard v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. ThiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Hammer v. Investors Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.