Legal Opinion

Blount v. Taft

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1978No. 66PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents a two-part question: Was Section 7 of Eastern’s bylaws, adopted 20 August 1971, a valid shareholders’ agreement; and, if so, was it subject to amendment under Section 4, which authorized amendment, repeal, or re-write of the bylaws by the affirmative vote of a majority of the stockholders?

The trial judge found as a fact that on 20 August 1971 all the shareholders of Eastern, by unanimous vote, adopted a set of bylaws. Among these was Section 7, which authorized the board of directors, by a majority vote, to designate an executive committee composed of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. McClennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Jackson v. HooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  3. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Galler v. GallerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Penley v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Reynolds Health Care Services, Inc. v. HMNH, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. State v. HarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Penley v. PenleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API