Jackson v. Hooper
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from an order of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Howell, whose opinion is reported ante p. 185.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dill, J.
The bill and injunction in this ease rest upon the theory that the complainant, who united with the defendant Horace E. Hooper in acquiring in equal shares all the stock of two foreign corporations, pursuant to an agreement claimed to create a partnership or joint adventure, is entitled to treat the two corporations, organized under foreign laws, as mere agencies or instrumentalities in the conduct of the joint business and to subject not only the stock owned by both parties, but all the corporate property to the control of the court of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- West v. CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- North State Copper & Gold Mining Co. v. FieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- von Arnim v. American Tube WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Welch v. Importers & Traders' National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Kavanaugh v. Commonwealth Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by71 opinions
- Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Kugler v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.