Legal Opinion

Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 30, 1971No. 100PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

The parties stipulated that the hearing before Judge Thorn-burg was for a determination of all issues except damages, under G.S. 136-108.

G.S. 136-108 provides:

“Determination of issues other than damages. — After the filing of the plat, the judge, upon motion and ten (10) days’ notice by either the Highway Commission or the owner, shall, either in or out of term, hear and determine any and all issues raised by the pleadings other than the issue of damages, including, but not limited to, if controverted, questions of necessary and proper parties, title to the land, interest…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Builders Steel Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. State v. McKethanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. . BrodieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. v. Southwestern Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. EvangelistaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API