Legal Opinion

Wilson v. McClenny

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1964No. 237PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

The first question presented by this appeal is whether the agreement of November 21, 1958 was void as against public policy. This preincorporation contract between the parties was intended to serve as a stockholders’ agreement after incorporation. Such agreements are governed by the general principles of contract law. 13 Am. Jur., Corporations § 127. The signatories bound themselves “to use their influence and stock votes” to secure the election of each as a director and the election of plaintiff by the directors as president of the corporation for a five-year period at a beginning salary of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. May v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. W. P. Iverson & Co. v. Dunham Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Embree Construction Group, Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API