Legal Opinion

Lititz Mutual Insurance v. Steely

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 2001No. 116 and 117 MAP 2000PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice.

The issue to be decided is whether a pollution exclusion clause in a commercial general liability insurance policy precludes coverage for injuries allegedly caused by the ingestion and/or inhalation of lead-based paint.

For approximately live and one-half years between 1988 and 1993, Steven Brown (“Steven”), a minor, resided in a rental property owned by Clifford and Barbara Steely (the “Steelys”). Thereafter, Steven resided for two years in a rental property owned by Jack and Shirley Yeager (the “Yeag-ers”). In 1996, Steven’s mother, Ethel Brown, commenced an action on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Gene & Harvey Builders, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Porterfield v. Audubon Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Gainsco Insurance Co. v. Amoco Production Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Mistick, Inc. v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API