Legal Opinion

Gainsco Insurance Co. v. Amoco Production Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 2002No. 00-302PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶1] The appellant, Gainseo Insurance Company (Gainsco), appeals from an order granting summary judgment to the appellee, Amoco Production Company (Amoco), in an insurance coverage dispute. The district court determined that Gainsco was guilty of both first-party and third-party bad faith in denying coverage and refusing to settle the underlying claim. We reverse and remand to the district court for entry of a judgment in favor of Gainseo.

NATURE OF THE CASE

[¶2] Amoco entered into a Well and Lease Service Master Contract (the Contract) with Andrews Trucking Company (Andrews).…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Guillen Ex Rel. Guillen v. Potomac Ins. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Clendenin Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Cathcart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Cornhusker Casualty Company v. SkajCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API