Legal Opinion

Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1999PublishedCited by 510 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice.

The issue in this declaratory judgment action is whether a pollution exclusion clause in a policy of commercial general liability insurance issued to Appellant, Madison Construction Company (“Madison”), by Appellee, Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company (“Harleysville”), relieves Harleysville of its obligation to defend Madison in an underlying personal injury action. We conclude, as did the en banc Superior Court, 451 Pa.Super. 136, 678 A.2d 802, that the pollution exclusion clause operates to bar coverage in the present case, and therefore affirm.

The events giving…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Reliance Insurance v. MoessnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by510 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner US, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

505 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API