Legal Opinion

Porterfield v. Audubon Indem. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 22, 2002No. 1010894PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

United States District Judge Ira DeMent, acting pursuant to Rule 18, Ala.R.App.P., certified to this Court the following question of law, the answer to which he anticipates will be dispositive of a case pending before him:

"Does the pollution exclusion clause contained in Audubon's comprehensive general liability insurance policy preclude coverage to its insured for liability for injuries allegedly caused from the ingestion of lead contained in paint, blinds, water, pipes and soil on premises operated by the insured?"

The case pending before Judge DeMent is styled "In the United States District…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Rapid-American Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. TRAVCO Insurance v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  3. Tanner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. HARTFORD INS. v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. United Fire & Casualty Company v. Titan Contractors Service, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API