MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance Exchange
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
In this case, we consider the meaning of an exclusionary clause in a comprehensive general liability (CGL) insurance policy that excludes injuries caused by the “discharge, dispersal, release or escape of pollutants.” Specifically, we are asked to determine whether that clause, a standard pollution exclusion clause, applies to exclude injury to a tenant resulting from a landlord’s allegedly negligent use of pesticides on his property. We conclude that in order for an exclusionary clause to effectively exclude coverage, it “ ‘must be conspicuous, plain and clear’ ” (Gray v.…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by320 opinions
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United National Insurance v. Spectrum Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Hall v. Time Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY v. Ribi Immunochem Research, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
315 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.