Legal Opinion
McMullen v. Synchrony Bank
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 19, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1983PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
While a gym membership typically improves one’s physical well-being at a slight cost to one’s fiscal health, the case at hand concerns a fitness endeavor that had a far greater impact on the wallet than the waistline. This suit alleges that fitness companies and two banks conspired to defraud gym member Valerie McMullen by opening unauthorized lines of credit in her name and processing unauthorized charges against that credit. She thus brought this suit against seven named Defendants and various unidentified corporations and…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- CD International Enterprises, Inc. v. Rockwell Capital Partners, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Wilson v. On the Rise Enters., LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Samenow v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Frese v. City Segway Tours of Washington, Dc, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.