Legal Opinion
Krukas v. AARP, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 17, 2019No. Civil Action No. 18-1124 (BAH)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Levay Court further explained that the theory of injury did "not concern the price of the insurance policy per se ," but was that "consumers were 'duped' into joining AARP and paying membership fees in order to access the AARP-branded polices from UnitedHealth," without being told that AARP made "a commission on each sale" and had this ulterior motive to recommend the policies. See Levay , 2018 WL 3425014, at *5. As such, the Levay Court concluded that the state insurance agency's "rate determination is different from what is at issue here-whether the lender mischaracterized the nature of…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Carlton Gunn v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Dane v. UnitedHealthcare Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Carlton Gunn v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Carlton Gunn v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Corporate Accountability Lab v. Sambazon, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.