Legal Opinion

Sargent v. Coppage

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1941No. Civ. 13286PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT (R. H.), J. pro tem.

From judgment for defendant in a suit involving money paid for a share in a gold mine plaintiff appeals.

In March, 1937, plaintiff entered into an agreement with defendant Coppage, William A. Martin, Jr., and Elbert Whitney by which plaintiff paid in $4000 and was to receive a four per cent interest in the mine. The agreement provided as follows:

“That for and in consideration of the sum of one ($1.00) dollar, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged and the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the first parties hereby sell, assign, set over and transfer to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SimonsOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Nicholl v. IpsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Hargiss v. Royal Air Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Wilcox-Gay Corp. v. Hosho of America, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API