Legal Opinion
Sargent v. Coppage
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 2, 1941No. Civ. 13286PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT (R. H.), J. pro tem.
From judgment for defendant in a suit involving money paid for a share in a gold mine plaintiff appeals.
In March, 1937, plaintiff entered into an agreement with defendant Coppage, William A. Martin, Jr., and Elbert Whitney by which plaintiff paid in $4000 and was to receive a four per cent interest in the mine. The agreement provided as follows:
“That for and in consideration of the sum of one ($1.00) dollar, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged and the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the first parties hereby sell, assign, set over and transfer to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
- People v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SimonsOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Nicholl v. IpsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hargiss v. Royal Air Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Wilcox-Gay Corp. v. Hosho of America, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959