Hargiss v. Royal Air Properties, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a directed verdict and judgment for defendant in an action to recover $43,396.34 allegedly advanced to defendant.
Pacts
In general, the basic facts are not in serious dispute. Stating the facts as stipulated to or testified to by plaintiff, it appears that on March 11, 1956, plaintiff, Harold L. Heath-man and Mrs. Esther Peister agreed to each put in $50,000 for the purchase and development of certain real estate. The purchase price was $235,000. These three parties will hereinafter, when spoken of together, be referred to as the partners. The original plan,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. SydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Miller v. California Roofing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weinstock v. L. A. Carpet, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Southern California First National Bank v. Quincy Cass AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Berg v. King-Cola, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hargiss v. Royal Air Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Nakashima v. MuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970