Legal Opinion

Wilcox-Gay Corp. v. Hosho of America, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

Motions by defendants Hosho of America, Inc., and The Hosho Corporation appearing specially to .set aside the service of the respective summonses as to them, made upon the defendant Tanaka while he was attending an exhibition conducted at the Hotel New Yorker. Plaintiffs cross-move for an order pursuant to section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act referring the questions of fact as to jurisdiction to a Referee or jury or for an order denying the motions, with leave to the defendants to plead the same facts as defenses in their respective answers.

The movant corporations contend that they are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Ultramar Company, Limited v. . Minerals Separation, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Sargent v. CoppageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. McCarver v. De Mornay-Bonardi Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lane v. Vacation Charters, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. Sulil Realty Corp. v. Rye Motors, Inc., New York County Courts1965
  3. Mirabella v. Banco Industrial de la Republica ArgentinaNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API