Legal Opinion
Nicholl v. Ipsen
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1955No. Civ. 5047PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
J.— Plaintiffs, as payees, brought this action upon five separate promissory notes signed by defendants Adele Ipsen and Erik S. Reinert. No service was had upon Reinert. Judgment was entered only against defendant Ipsen for $5,893.66, plus attorneys’ fees and interest.
Prior to July 15, 1949, defendants Ipsen and Reinert had acquired the United States rights (denominated Buen patents) in certain Norwegian patents covering a mechanical invention pertaining to a certain method of constructing houses from logs and other materials by means of interlocking ends. On July 15, 1949, defendants signed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Miller v. California Roofing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. RankinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. SchockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Stoner v. BisnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.