Legal Opinion

Lickley v. County Board of Education

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1923No. Civ. No. 4334PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The plaintiff applied to the superior court for a writ of prohibition to restrain and prohibit the defendants from hearing or taking any further proceedings in connection with the hearing of certain charges filed with the county board of education of the county of Los Angeles against the plaintiff. In the petition for prohibition it was alleged that three certain members of the board were disqualified from hearing said charges by reason of bias, prejudice, and hatred toward the petitioner, and that said members prior to the hearing have determined out of such personal bias, hatred, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of EducationWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Tyler v. PresleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. In Re GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Wood v. Board of Fire CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Imperial Water Co. No. 3 v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Reilly v. Police CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Lindsay Strathmore Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Erickson v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API