Southern Pacific Co. v. Smith
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Supersedeas. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Guy V. Shoup, Henley C. Booth, George D. Squires, and Frank B. Austin, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
Regardless of the equities of plaintiff’s application, matters as to which the superior court of Kern County had complete power to provide in its final judgment (City of Pasadena v. Superior Court, 157 Cal. 781, [109 Pac. 620]), this court is satisfied that it must be held, in view of the thoroughly settled rule to that effect, that it has no power to grant the relief sought. The situation is simply that the superior court by final judgment has denied the injunctive relief sought, refusing to make any provision in such judgment by way of injunctive relief pending appeal. Any temporary…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- McCann v. Union Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Lickley v. County Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Lovelock Mercantile Co. v. Lovelock Irrigation DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1928
- Martin v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.