Legal Opinion
In Re Graves
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 1923No. Crim. No. 984PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an application for a supersedeas. By a judgment of the superior court for Los Angeles County, made January 22, 1923, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for one year. From that judgment he has taken an appeal to this court, and now asks for a supersedeas to stay the judgment of suspension pending his appeal.
This is not a case for the issuance of supersedeas. The judgment of suspension acts directly against petitioner without the necessity for process or proceedings of any kind for its enforcement. (Tyler v. Presley, 72 Cal. 290 [13 Pac. 856].) It is true that the power…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Tyler v. PresleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Wood v. Board of Fire CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Hoppe v. HoppeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Taylor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Imperial Water Co. No. 3 v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re AlboriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.