Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1933No. Docket No. 8884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A petition for a writ of supersedeas. It appears that an abstract of a judgment recovered against petitioner in the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles was filed in the office of the clerk of the Municipal Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco, and that an execution issued thereon to the sheriff of said city and county. Following this certain personal property belonging to petitioner was levied upon and seized by the sheriff. Petitioner thereupon applied for and there was issued by the Superior Court in and for said city and county a writ of certiorari. It was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bagley v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Ohaver v. FenechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Imperial Water Co. No. 3 v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Tyler v. PresleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hulse v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Warburton v. KieferleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. People Ex Rel. Boarts v. City of WestmorelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API