Wood v. Board of Fire Commissioners
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Supersedeas during the pendency of an appeal from a judgment denying a Writ of Prohibition. Petition denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWeller, J.
Appellant applies for a supersedeas during the pendency of the appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Los Angeles County denying a writ of prohibition against the board of fire commissioners of the city of Los Angeles.
In an original proceeding instituted in this court for the same purpose before the appeal was taken, it was considered that sufficient cause was shown by the petition, and an alternative writ was issued. We have this day decided (ante, p. 593, [195 Pac. 739]) that, as the right to appeal existed, this court should not exercise its original jurisdiction, and the writ was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Tyler v. PresleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Rogers v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Wood v. Board of Fire CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by9 opinions
- Imperial Water Co. No. 3 v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People Ex Rel. Boarts v. City of WestmorelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Lindsay Strathmore Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Lickley v. County Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.