Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Police Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1924No. S. F. No. 11292PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to prevent the respondent court from proceeding with the trial of the petitioner upon a charge of criminal libel now pending before it, upon the ground that the complaint therein does not state facts sufficient to charge a criminal offense and upon the further ground that the respondent court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof in that the Whitney Act (Stats. 1885, p. 213) and the act of 1901 (Stats. 1901, p. 576) are unconstitutional and void. The facts of this ease are stated by petitioner as follows:

“This is an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. People v. HadleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Dawson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Dawson v. Superior Court of Cty. of KingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Lickley v. County Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Funeral Dirs. Ass'n. v. Bd. of Funeral Dirs. & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. McDonough v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Calhoun v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API