Legal Opinion
Paul v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 23, 1990No. Cong. Ref. No. 2-88PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEARING OFFICER’S REPORT
KENNETH R. HARKINS, Hearing Officer.
This congressional reference case is concerned with a private bill to compensate Frederick Paul for legal services performed between January 1, 1966, and December 18, 1971, in connection with enactment of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971 (ANCSA).1 The bill was referred to the Claims Court by the Senate for a report under the statutory standards and the court’s rules applicable to congression*238al reference cases.2 The complaint was filed December 28, 1988; the resolution specifies the court is to file its report within 18…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Burkhardt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
- Herman Adams, Doing Business as Adams Manufacturing Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kanehl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Spalding & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Banfi Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.