Herman Adams, Doing Business as Adams Manufacturing Company v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
This is a suit for direct or primary loss in the amount of $172,081.92 caused by delays which occurred in the performance of a contract to produce a large number of wood tent pins for defendant. A claim for so-called “indirect loss” or secondary loss in the amount of $43,061.91 is not deemed to be supported by substantial evidence (and is no longer pressed by plaintiff). Extensive delay is attributed by plaintiff to the arbitrary and unreasonable action of an employee of defendant, Inspector Joseph C. Burkhart, in rejecting as many as 50 per cent of the tent pins produced by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. RindskopfSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Burkhardt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
- United States v. Joseph X. StreblerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Milton R. Psaty, and Martin M. Psaty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Carolyn Brafman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. The United States of America, George I. Norman, Iii, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.