Legal Opinion

United States v. Realty Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 25, 1896No. 870, 869PublishedCited by 189 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

¥p. Justice Peckham

delivered the opinion of the court.

These are writs of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The actions were brought in that court under the second section of the act approved March 3,1887, c. 359, 24 Stat. 505, commonly known as the Tucker act. Both actions were brought to obtain payment of moneys by reason of the legislation of Congress in regard to sugar bounties. The court below in each case gave judgment for the plaintiffs therein-, and the-Government by writ of error brings the cases here for review.

The legislation out…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Town of Guilford v. . the Supervisors of Chenango CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. Williams v. HeardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. WeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Heirs of Emerson v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by189 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API