Legal Opinion

Sutton v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 19, 1981No. [No. 132, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavidson, J.

In this case, at the direction of the trial court, a plea of not guilty upon an agreed statement of facts was tendered. No defense was raised. A plea bargain was entered recommending probation. The question presented is whether, under these particular circumstances, the requirements of Maryland Rule 731 c are applicable.

Rule 731 c provides:

"The court may not accept a plea of guilty without first questioning the defendant on the record to determine that the plea is made voluntarily, with understanding of the nature of the charge and the consequences of the plea. The court may accept the plea…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re MosleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Metheny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Ennis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API