Legal Opinion

Maus v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 4, 1987No. 19, 54 and 66, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The three cases we now consider present a common question: When a probationer has admitted violations of probation, the probation has been revoked, and a sentence of incarceration imposed, does § 12-302(e) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Art. (1984 Repl.Vol.) require that further review be by application for leave to appeal, or does that statute impose that procedure only upon review of a judgment entered after a plea of guilty in a criminal case? The Court of Special Appeals believed that § 12-302(e) applies in the probation context. We do not agree and, therefore,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Rucker v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Gunning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. McElroy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API