Legal Opinion
Ennis v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 1, 1986No. 110, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COUCH, Judge.
In this case the petitioner, Carol Ann Ennis, asks us to resolve the question presented in her petition for writ of certiorari:
“Whether the court below erred in refusing to review petitioner’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to convict her because petitioner’s counsel did not move for a judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence, in that: The record clearly shows that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict petitioner of the offense with which she was charged; petitioner did not waive her right not to be convicted except upon proof beyond a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Holt Civic Club v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Warfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- In Re Petition for Writ of ProhibitionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Gore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.