Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 3, 1982No. 1191, September Term, 1981PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In this appeal from an assault conviction, we consider nostra sponte whether Maryland Rule 736 g 2 (1981 Cum.Supp.) preserves for appellate review a pretrial motion to suppress an improper identification and unlawfully seized evidence when no objection is made to their introduction at trial. We think that, except under certain circumstances where waiver is shown, the rule clearly establishes its own basis for appellate review. Whitfield v. State, 42 Md. App. 107, 124-5, 400 A.2d 772 (1979), rev’d on other grounds, 287 Md. 124, 411 A.2d 415 (1980). Despite our finding that the suppression…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lefkowitz v. NewsomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Clay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Ricketts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Trusty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. McMillian v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Aiken v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Trott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API