Legal Opinion

Sharon v. Sharon

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1885No. 9984PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order awarding alimony and counsel fees. Motion to dismiss appeal from the order granting alimony and counsel fees. The action was brought to establish a disputed marriage and for a divorce. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The report of the case on a former motion to dismiss is contained in 67 Cal. 185.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

— This is the second motion to dismiss the appeal in this case from the order granting alimony and counsel fees.

The motion is made on the following grounds:—

“ 1. That no notice of appeal from the order mentioned has been filed, as required by section 940 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
“ 2. That no undertaking on appeal has been filed, as required by the same section.
“ 3. That no transcript on appeal has been filed, as required by rule 2 of this court.”

The notice of appeal is printed in the record, and is as follows:—

“ You will please take notice that the defendant in the above-entitled action…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Peck v. VandenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Carpentier v. WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. People v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harrelson v. Miller & Lux Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. City of Duncan v. AbramsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. In re Dewar's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API