Legal Opinion

In re Dewar's Estate

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from First Judicial District, Lewis and Clarice Coumty. On motion to dismiss the appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal. The substantial part of the notice thereof is as follows: “Henry C. Yaeger, administrator of the estate of William A. Dewar, deceased, hereby appeals to the Supreme Court of the State of Montana from an order made in the District Court .... on the twenty-second day of July, 1890, wherein said court sustained the objections then considered to the administrator’s final report herein, and from all subsequent action in said cause, including the decree of distribution made therein on the thirtieth day of July, 1890, and from the whole thereof.”

It appeal’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bates v. RybergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. People v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Goldtree v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. In re Estate of MarreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of Bailey v. CullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Woodbine Savings Bank v. YagerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. In Re Bernheim's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. In re Phillips' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. In re Kane's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API