Spreckels v. Spreckels
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order dissolving an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
In this case two appeals were taken by-plaintiffs—one from an order dissolving an injunction, the other from the judgment. Only one undertaking on appeal was given, which was intended to serve for both appeals. The undertaking sufficiently recites the order and the judgment, and the sureties stipulate “ that the said appellants will pay all damages and costs which may be awarded against them, or either of them, on the appeals, or either of them, or on the dismissal thereof, or of either of them, not exceeding six hundred dollars, to which amount we acknowledge ourselves jointly and severally…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Home & Loan Associates v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by14 opinions
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- San Diego Savings Bank v. GoodsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- In re Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Thomas v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Morse v. CallantineMontana Supreme Court · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.