Emeric v. Alvarado
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an interlocutory judgment in partition of the late District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District in and for the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial, and an order appointing a receiver. The action was for the partition of the “Bancho San Pablo,” being seventeen thousand nine hundred and thirty-eight and fifty-nine one-hundredths acres of land in the county of Contra Costa.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an interlocutory judgment in partition of the late District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District in and for the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial, and an order appointing a receiver. The action was for the partition of the “Bancho San Pablo,” being seventeen thousand nine hundred and thirty-eight and fifty-nine one-hundredths acres of land in the county of Contra Costa. The defendants were several hundred in number, and comprised many minors. The action was commenced in November, 1867. The interlocutory judgment was rendered on the 15th…
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
In this cause, which is an action for the partition of the San Pablo Rauch, situated 'in the county of Contra Costa, and containing' seventeen thousand nine hundred and thirty-eight and fifty-nine one-hundredths acres of land, there are five appeals, each prosecuted by -some of the defendants. Of these five appeals, two are from the interlocutory judgment or decree, one from an order denying a motion for a new trial made by several defendants, and the other two are from an order appointing a receiver. We are asked to strike out the bill of exceptions, on the ground that the notice of motion…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Beard v. FederySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Martin Pickett's Heirs v. LegerwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- La Société Française D'Epargnes et de Prévoyance Mutuelle v. Dist. Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Dist.California Supreme Court · 1879
- Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Estate of PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Doty v. BarnardTexas Supreme Court · 1898
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.