Legal Opinion
Matter of Eigenheer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 27, 1990No. C9-89-1661PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Relator Robert Eigenheer appeals from the Commissioner of Natural Resources’ order to remove fill from protected wetland. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts in this case are undisputed. We, therefore, essentially adopt the findings of fact of the Commissioner of Natural Resources.
In 1987, Jon Hegner owned a piece of property in the City of East Bethel, Anoka County, the north half of which is part of a protected 1 wetland. The southeastern portion contains a small strip of upland along Polk Street N.E. (the western boundary). The southern middle portion of Hegner’s property is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Sullivan v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- McKee v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Application of ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Drum v. Minnesota Board of Water & Soil ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Nastrom v. City of BlaineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993