Legal Opinion
Application of Christenson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 24, 1987No. C5-86-332PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
This case arises under Minnesota’s public waters and wetlands legislation, Minn.Stat. § 105.39 (1986), 105.391 (1986) and related statutes, and concerns the denial of a permit to drain a protected wetland. Allard Christenson is requesting this court’s review of a court of appeals’ decision affirming the Department of Natural Resources (hereinafter, DNR) order rejecting his application to drain wetland 47-219 located on his 360-acre farm. 1 We affirm the decision of the court of appeals and order of the commissioner denying the permit.
The Minnesota State Legislature, in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Contos v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. HatchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Commissioner of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Public Water/Wetlands Hearings UnitCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Plocher v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Drum v. Minnesota Board of Water & Soil ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Smith v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.