Legal Opinion

Nastrom v. City of Blaine

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1993No. C6-92-1806PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

The City of Blaine appeals the trial court’s determination that the city council authorized public improvements by an inadequate number of votes, thereby invalidating special assessments. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

Since 1978, respondents Dennis and Char Nastrom have owned approximately five acres of land, used as a homestead, in the City of Blaine. Before 1987, no street or public improvements adjacent to their land had been proposed or approved.

In 1987, the city engineering staff began preliminary work on Project 87-11, an un-petitioned plan for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Tri-State Land Co. v. City of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Matter of EigenheerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Rhodenbaugh v. City of BayportCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nastrom v. City of BlaineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API