Legal Opinion

Drum v. Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1998No. C7-97-778PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Ralph S. Drum, a landowner, appeals by writ of certiorari from a decision of the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources affirming a decision of the Douglas Soil and Water Conservation District to assert jurisdiction over a 15-acre body of water. Because the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources acted within its statutory authority to promulgate rules to implement the Wetland Conservation Act (the “Act”), we affirm.

FACTS

Ralph S. Drum owns a homestead near Lobster Lake in Douglas County. A marsh is situated about 50 feet from his home. In 1971, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Application of ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Hentges v. Minnesota Board of Water & Soil ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Board Order, Kells v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API