Gortmaker v. Seaton
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
This suit for declaratory relief was brought by the district attorney of Marion County, who claims to be in doubt about the meaning of various statutes and regulations designed by the Legislative Assembly to restrict the sale of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). ① For reasons set forth below, the suit must be dismissed without a decision on the merits.
It is fundamental to appellate jurisprudence that courts do not sit “to decide abstract, hypothetical, or contingent questions * * * or to decide any constitutional question in advance of the necessity for its decision * * *.” Federation of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Oregon Creamery Manufacturers Ass'n v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Hamel v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Kellas v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.