Legal Opinion

Kellas v. Department of Corrections

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 2006No. CA A118362, SC S51378PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

This is a case of judicial review of administrative rules. Petitioner below (respondent on review) Kellas 1 challenges the lawfulness of two administrative rules under ORS 183.400, which provides, in part, that “[t]he validity of any rule may be determined upon a petition by any person to the Court of Appeals!.]” (Emphasis added.) The Court of Appeals declined to reach the merits of petitioner’s arguments because it concluded that petitioner lacked standing to challenge the rules in question. The Court of Appeals dismissed the petition. We reverse.

We take the pertinent facts from the record…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Morgan v. Sisters School District 6Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Doyle v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Frakes v. NayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API