Legal Opinion
Rosenquist v. Haralambides
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1987No. A032292PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
This appeal is taken from a judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of respondent Nicolas Haralambides. The primary contention urged by appellant Gary Rosenquist is that the trial court erred in failing to rule that the arbitrator acted in excess of his powers by awarding attorney fees after the date agreed to by the parties for the making of an arbitration award. Alternatively, Rosenquist argues that his petition to vacate the arbitration award should have been granted as the arbitrator failed to determine all issues submitted to him.
I
In 1983, the parties entered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Lindholm v. GalvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Rodrigues v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Taranow v. BroksteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Ajida Technologies, Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- AJIDA TECHNOLOGIES v. Roos InstrumentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Century City Med. Plaza v. Sperling, Isaacs & EisenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Lopes v. MillsapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.