Legal Opinion
Taranow v. Brokstein
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1982No. Civ. 47764PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
The above-named parties, in 1975, entered into a written partnership agreement under which they proposed to practice dentistry. As relevant here, the agreement provided:
“Should any partner be forced to bring suit to enforce the terms of this partnership agreement, the prevailing partner shall be awarded his costs of suit incurred therein and his reasonable attorney’s fees....
“In the event of a controversy or claim arising out of this agreement which cannot be settled by the partners or their legal representatives, it shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Bleecher v. ConteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Severtson v. Williams Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- DiMarco v. ChaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Tate v. Saratoga Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Mir v. Charter Suburban HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.