Legal Opinion
Lindholm v. Galvin
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1979No. Civ. 54566PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.
Plaintiffs Thomas C. Lindholm and Edward Dale Griffin sought damages as provided in Penal Code section 637.2 1 from defendants City of Simi Valley, Gerald Thomas Galvin and Carl Morrow. Thereafter, pursuant to stipulation, defendant city was dismissed from the action without prejudice. Defendants Galvin and Morrow answered the complaint after their demurrer was overruled.
The parties entered into a written stipulation which provided, inter alia, that “[t]his matter shall be tried to conclusion as an arbitration proceeding under the provisions of Section 1282 et…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Morris v. ZuckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lehto v. Underground Constr. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Santa Clara-San Benito Chapter of the National Electrical Contractors' Ass'n v. Local Union No. 332California Court of Appeal · 1974
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GuleserianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Woodard v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Severtson v. Williams Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- All Points Traders, Inc. v. Barrington AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.